netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] vxlan: insert ipv6 macro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=hENcp32QHB890DbnKN8QxQWbSLRcsUnE86YN-2nUZ_q7OSA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:28:25 +0800
From:   zhuyj <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>
To:     Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, pabeni@...hat.com,
        daniel@...earbox.net, Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
        Alexander Duyck <aduyck@...antis.com>,
        hannes@...essinduktion.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] vxlan: insert ipv6 macro

 Hi,  Jiri

The dumped source code is in the attachment. Please check it. I think
this file can explain all.

If anything, please just let me know.
Thanks a lot.

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 21:01:54 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
>> How to explain the following source code? As you mentioned,  are the
>> #ifdefs in the following source pointless?
>
> They are not, the code would not compile without them. Look how struct
> vxlan_dev is defined.
>
> Those are really basic questions you have. I suggest you try yourself
> before asking such questions next time. In this case, you could
> trivially remove the #ifdef and see for yourself, as I explained in the
> previous email. Please do not try to offload your homework to other
> people. It's very obvious you didn't even try to understand this, even
> after the feedback you received.
>
> And do not top post.
>
> Thanks,
>
>  Jiri

View attachment "dump-vxlan.txt" of type "text/plain" (602468 bytes)