[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8760ov7938.fsf@belgarion.home>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 08:12:11 +0200
From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, nico@...xnic.net,
linux@...linux.org.uk, arnd@...db.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] net: smc91x: isolate u16 writes alignment workaround
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
> Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 22:33:45 +0200
>
>> Writes to u16 has a special handling on 3 PXA platforms, where the
>> hardware wiring forces these writes to be u32 aligned.
>>
>> This patch isolates this handling for PXA platforms as before, but
>> enables this "workaround" to be set up dynamically, which will be the
>> case in device-tree build types.
>>
>> This patch was tested on 2 PXA platforms : mainstone, which relies on
>> the workaround, and lubbock, which doesn't.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
>
> Please resubmit this patch series:
>
> 1) Respun against net-next, these don't currently apply cleanly there.
>
> 2) With a proper "[PATCH 0/3] ..." posting explaining at a high level
> what this patch series does, how it does it, and why it does it
> that way.
Sure, let me retest it after the rebase, and I'll post again.
Cheers.
--
Robert
Powered by blists - more mailing lists