[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161017.104200.2266025643403507437.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 10:42:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: stephen@...workplumber.org
Cc: dsa@...ulusnetworks.com, jiri@...lanox.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
dledford@...hat.com, sean.hefty@...el.com,
hal.rosenstock@...il.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
j.vosburgh@...il.com, vfalico@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 02/11] net: Introduce new api for walking
upper and lower devices
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 05:21:21 -0700
> You should write this more succinctly as:
>
> static bool __netdev_has_upper_dev(struct net_device *upper_dev, void *data)
> {
> struct net_device *dev = data;
>
> return upper_dev == dev;
> }
>
> bool netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
> struct net_device *upper_dev)
> {
> return netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(dev,
> __netdev_has_upper_dev, upper_dev);
> }
>
> No if/else needed. No cast of void * ptr need. Use const if possible?
Agreed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists