netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net: vlan: Use sizeof instead of literal number

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+6hz4pQQg8U4+Fs47zEUxe1Khb+oqqQSKGVyT9fmzjhObUmvA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:49:37 +0800
From:   Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net: vlan: Use sizeof instead of literal number

Hi David,

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 9:36 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> It never makes sense to send the same patch for both net and net-next.
>
> If it's a bug fix, it goes to 'net'.  And it will be eventually
> be naturally merged into 'net-next'.
>
> Otherwise, if it's a new feature, cleanup, or optimization it goes to
> 'net-next'.

Because I forget add the "net-next" in the title of first patch, so I
send the second patch with right title.
And I have replied the first patch and said the reason.

Regards
Feng