[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161019.161206.1749616830232202176.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:12:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: robert.jarzmik@...e.fr
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master 1436/1582]
drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c:2378:6: error: implicit declaration of
function 'machine_is_assabet'
From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 21:58:06 +0200
> Hi David,
>
> Here is a little mess I created with my former serie :
>> drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c: In function 'smc_drv_probe':
>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c:2378:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'machine_is_assabet' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> if (machine_is_assabet() && machine_has_neponset())
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>>
>> vim +/machine_is_assabet +2378 drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c
>
> The mess comes from the patch "net: smc91x: isolate u16 writes alignment
> workaround", where I though I had removed all "machine_is_*()" calls, and I
> didn't notice the machine_is_assabet() one.
>
> The fix is to re-add the removed include in the wrong chunk in [1].
>
> Now do you want :
> - another apart patch to fix the faulty one
> - a "fixup!" patch to fixup the commit in your next tree
> - or anything else
Please send me a fixup follow-on patch.
If changes are in my tree, they are part of the permanent record
and won't be rebased out.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists