[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpXNbc1pphwfvUoFXE318pgVZdkvHWKG98kUyntUno3Cqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:41:44 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Baozeng Ding <sploving1@...il.com>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net] ipv6: fix a potential deadlock in do_ipv6_setsockopt()
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
>> index 46ad699..b8c8d20 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
>> @@ -414,7 +414,9 @@ int inet6_release(struct socket *sock)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> /* Free mc lists */
>> + rtnl_lock();
>
> Certainly not.
>
> Some people want IPv6 being reasonably fast.
Oh, good catch, I should move the 'if' check out too...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists