[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161020165807.GB97796@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:58:09 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: William Tu <u9012063@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] bpf: fix potential percpu map overcopy to
user.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 06:04:38PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
> index ee384f0..d4832e8 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,33 @@
>
> static int map_flags;
>
> +static unsigned int num_possible_cpus(void)
> +{
> + static const char *fcpu = "/sys/devices/system/cpu/possible";
> + unsigned int val, possible_cpus = 0;
> + char buff[128];
> + FILE *fp;
> +
> + fp = fopen(fcpu, "r");
> + if (!fp) {
> + printf("Failed to open %s: '%s'!\n", fcpu, strerror(errno));
> + exit(1);
> + }
> +
> + while (fgets(buff, sizeof(buff), fp)) {
> + if (sscanf(buff, "%*u-%u", &val) == 1)
> + possible_cpus = val;
> + }
looks great to me.
Could you move it into bpf_sys.h or somehow make it common in libbpf
and reuse it in samples/bpf/ ?
Since quite a few samples need this fix as well.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists