[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1476997834.7065.35.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:10:34 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
Alexander Duyck <aduyck@...antis.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 2/3] udp: implement memory accounting helpers
On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 22:31 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> +
> +int __udp_enqueue_schedule_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct sk_buff_head *list = &sk->sk_receive_queue;
> + int rmem, delta, amt, err = -ENOMEM;
> + int size = skb->truesize;
> +
> + /* try to avoid the costly atomic add/sub pair when the receive
> + * queue is full; always allow at least a packet
> + */
> + rmem = atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc);
> + if (rmem && (rmem + size > sk->sk_rcvbuf))
> + goto drop;
> +
> + /* we drop only if the receive buf is full and the receive
> + * queue contains some other skb
> + */
> + rmem = atomic_add_return(size, &sk->sk_rmem_alloc);
> + if ((rmem > sk->sk_rcvbuf) && (rmem > size))
> + goto uncharge_drop;
> +
> + skb_orphan(skb);
Minor point :
UDP should already have orphaned skbs ? (it uses skb_steal_sock())
Powered by blists - more mailing lists