[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1477084423.7065.88.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:13:43 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
Alexander Duyck <aduyck@...antis.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 2/3] udp: implement memory accounting helpers
On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 13:55 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Avoid using the generic helpers.
> Use the receive queue spin lock to protect the memory
> accounting operation, both on enqueue and on dequeue.
>
> On dequeue perform partial memory reclaiming, trying to
> leave a quantum of forward allocated memory.
>
> On enqueue use a custom helper, to allow some optimizations:
> - use a plain spin_lock() variant instead of the slightly
> costly spin_lock_irqsave(),
> - avoid dst_force check, since the calling code has already
> dropped the skb dst
> - avoid orphaning the skb, since skb_steal_sock() already did
> the work for us
>
> The above needs custom memory reclaiming on shutdown, provided
> by the udp_destruct_sock().
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists