netdev - [PATCH net-next 1/1] driver: tun: Forbid to set IFF_TUN and IFF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1477030452-1765-1-git-send-email-fgao@ikuai8.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:14:12 +0800
From:   fgao@...ai8.com
To:     davem@...emloft.net, jasowang@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     gfree.wind@...il.com, Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/1] driver: tun: Forbid to set IFF_TUN and IFF_TAP at the same time

From: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>

Current tun driver permits the ifr_flags is set with IFF_TUN and
IFF_TAP at the same time. But actually there is only IFF_TUN flag
works. And it does not make sense these two flags are set, so add
this check.

Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
---
 drivers/net/tun.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
index 8093e39..c1f89c1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
@@ -1752,6 +1752,10 @@ static int tun_set_iff(struct net *net, struct file *file, struct ifreq *ifr)
 		if (err < 0)
 			return err;
 
+		if ((ifr->ifr_flags & (IFF_TUN | IFF_TAP)) == (IFF_TUN | IFF_TAP)) {
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
 		/* Set dev type */
 		if (ifr->ifr_flags & IFF_TUN) {
 			/* TUN device */
-- 
1.9.1