netdev - Re: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: mark symbol static where possible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87twbz2sn8.fsf@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:37:15 +0200
From:   Jakub Sitnicki <jkbs@...hat.com>
To:     Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>
Cc:     andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de, xie.baoyou@....com.cn,
        han.fei@....com.cn, tang.qiang007@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: mark symbol static where possible

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:32 AM GMT, Baoyou Xie wrote:
> We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1:
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8192e.c:1557:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'rtl8192eu_power_off' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>
> In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is
> declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
> So this patch marks this function with 'static'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> index 883fd98..4d975f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> @@ -2701,7 +2701,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_setup_port(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port)
>  	return mv88e6xxx_port_write(chip, port, PORT_DEFAULT_VLAN, 0x0000);
>  }
>  
> -int mv88e6xxx_g1_set_switch_mac(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, u8 *addr)
> +static int mv88e6xxx_g1_set_switch_mac(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, u8 *addr)
>  {
>  	int err;

Probably a mix-up - your patch doesn't match the description.

Thanks,
Jakub