[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161026155202.5d99d935@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:52:02 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To: Shrijeet Mukherjee <shrijeet@...il.com>
Cc: brouer@...hat.com, mst@...hat.com, tom@...bertland.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, shm@...ulusnetworks.com,
roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC WIP] Patch for XDP support for virtio_net
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 04:07:23 +0000
Shrijeet Mukherjee <shrijeet@...il.com> wrote:
> This patch adds support for xdp ndo and also inserts the xdp program
> call into the merged RX buffers and big buffers paths
I really appreciate you are doing this for virtio_net.
My first question is: Is the (packet) page data writable?
(MST might be able to answer?)
As this is currently an XDP requirement[1].
> * The small packet skb receive is skipped for now
> * No TX for now
I do see more and more valid use-cases for only implementing XDP_DROP
and not necessarily also implementing XDP_TX. This does requires that
we implement some kind of feature/capabilities negotiation mechanism[2].
[1] https://prototype-kernel.readthedocs.io/en/latest/networking/XDP/design/requirements.html#write-access-to-packet-data
[2] https://prototype-kernel.readthedocs.io/en/latest/networking/XDP/design/design.html#capabilities-negotiation
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists