[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+6hz4rB5zJDLqhf0bQVhp9=EyZ7kjO3hu-6QtvMmGx-wszNaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 22:10:47 +0800
From: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] driver: tun: Use new macro SOCK_IOC_MAGIC
instead of literal number 0x89
Hi David,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:12 PM, David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote:
> From: fgao@...ai8.com
>> Sent: 25 October 2016 13:56
>> The current codes use _IOC_TYPE(cmd) == 0x89 to check if the cmd is one
>> socket ioctl command like SIOCGIFHWADDR. But the literal number 0x89 may
>> confuse readers. So create one macro SOCK_IOC_MAGIC like SPI_IOC_MAGIC to
>> enhance the readability.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/tun.c | 2 +-
>> include/uapi/linux/sockios.h | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
>> index 9328568..9efd185 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
>> @@ -1985,7 +1985,7 @@ static long __tun_chr_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>> int le;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - if (cmd == TUNSETIFF || cmd == TUNSETQUEUE || _IOC_TYPE(cmd) == 0x89) {
>> + if (cmd == TUNSETIFF || cmd == TUNSETQUEUE || _IOC_TYPE(cmd) == SOCK_IOC_MAGIC) {
>> if (copy_from_user(&ifr, argp, ifreq_len))
>> return -EFAULT;
>> } else {
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/sockios.h b/include/uapi/linux/sockios.h
>> index 8e7890b..b8f42f2 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/sockios.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/sockios.h
>> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
>> #define SIOCINQ FIONREAD
>> #define SIOCOUTQ TIOCOUTQ /* output queue size (not sent + not acked) */
>>
>> +#define SOCK_IOC_MAGIC 0x89
>> +
>> /* Routing table calls. */
>> #define SIOCADDRT 0x890B /* add routing table entry */
>> #define SIOCDELRT 0x890C /* delete routing table entry */
>
> Shouldn't these constants be defined in terms of SOCK_IOC_MAGIC?
> And there must be a better name!
>
> David
>
How about the SOCK_IOC_TYPE or SOCK_IOC_BASE ?
There are ETRAXGPIO_IOCTYPE and HARDWALL_IOCTL_BASE already.
Regards
Feng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists