lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:52:07 +0200
From:   Jann Horn <>
To:     Mickaël Salaün <>
Cc:, Alexei Starovoitov <>,
        Andy Lutomirski <>,
        Daniel Borkmann <>,
        Daniel Mack <>,
        David Drysdale <>,
        "David S . Miller" <>,
        "Eric W . Biederman" <>,
        James Morris <>,
        Kees Cook <>,
        Paul Moore <>,
        Sargun Dhillon <>,
        "Serge E . Hallyn" <>, Tejun Heo <>,
        Thomas Graf <>, Will Drewry <>,,,,,
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 00/18] Landlock LSM: Unprivileged sandboxing

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 08:56:36AM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> The loaded Landlock eBPF programs can be triggered by a seccomp filter
> returning RET_LANDLOCK. In addition, a cookie (16-bit value) can be passed from
> a seccomp filter to eBPF programs. This allow flexible security policies
> between seccomp and Landlock.

Is this still up to date, or was that removed in v3?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists