[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87funhv3xj.fsf@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:10:32 +0200
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jkbs@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] ipv6: Compute multipath hash for forwarded ICMP errors from offending packet
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 03:25 PM GMT, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jakub Sitnicki <jkbs@...hat.com>
> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:28:52 +0200
>
>> + inner_iph = skb_header_pointer(
>> + skb, skb_transport_offset(skb) + sizeof(*icmph),
>> + sizeof(_inner_iph), &_inner_iph);
>
> Please do not style this call like this, put as many arguments as
> you can on the first line.
>
> inner_iph = skb_header_pointer(skb,
> skb_transport_offset(skb) + sizeof(*icmph),
> sizeof(_inner_iph), &_inner_iph);
>
> And on the second and subsequent lines, indent to the first column after
> the openning parenthesis of the first line.
FWIW, I had it styled like that and then changed it. Will change back.
In my defense - checkpatch.pl made me do it, Your Honor! (line too long)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists