[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1477690300.2167.26.camel@tiscali.nl>
Date:   Fri, 28 Oct 2016 23:31:40 +0200
From:   Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:     Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Cc:     John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] kconfig: introduce the "imply" keyword
On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 23:10 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2016, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > What happens when a tristate symbol is implied by a symbol set to 'y'
> > and by a symbol set to 'm'?
> 
> That's respectively the third and second rows in the table above.
I meant: two separate symbols implying the same symbol at the same
time. One of those symbols set to 'y' and the other set to 'm'.
Anyhow, I hope to play with a mock Kconfig fragment the next few days
to find out myself.
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
