lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 29 Oct 2016 16:18:57 -0700
From:   Brenden Blanco <bblanco@...mgrid.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net/mlx4_en: Refactor the XDP forwarding
 rings scheme

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:07:02PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 05:52:04PM +0300, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> > Separately manage the two types of TX rings: regular ones, and XDP.
> > Upon an XDP set, do not borrow regular TX rings and convert them
> > into XDP ones, but allocate new ones, unless we hit the max number
> > of rings.
> > Which means that in systems with smaller #cores we will not consume
> > the current TX rings for XDP, while we are still in the num TX limit.
> 
> The commit log is too scarce for details...
> So questions:
> - Did you test with changing the number of channels after xdp prog is loaded?
> That was the recent bug that Brenden fixed.
> - does it still have 256 tx queue limit or xdp tx rings can go over?
> - Any performance implications ?
> 
> Brenden, could you please review this patch?
Sure, sorry for the delay...was traveling.
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists