[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161029.120211.887919203026365142.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 12:02:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: kraigatgoog@...il.com
Cc: soheil@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] inet: Fix missing return value in inet6_hash
From: Craig Gallek <kraigatgoog@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:08:49 -0400
> From: Craig Gallek <kraig@...gle.com>
>
> As part of a series to implement faster SO_REUSEPORT lookups,
> commit 086c653f5862 ("sock: struct proto hash function may error")
> added return values to protocol hash functions and
> commit 496611d7b5ea ("inet: create IPv6-equivalent inet_hash function")
> implemented a new hash function for IPv6. However, the latter does
> not respect the former's convention.
>
> This properly propagates the hash errors in the IPv6 case.
>
> Fixes: 496611d7b5ea ("inet: create IPv6-equivalent inet_hash function")
> Reported-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Craig Gallek <kraig@...gle.com>
Applied and queued up for -stable, thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists