netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next V3 0/9] liquidio CN23XX VF support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20161029.143126.1818409172503412109.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Sat, 29 Oct 2016 14:31:26 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     rvatsavayi@...iumnetworks.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V3 0/9] liquidio CN23XX VF support

From: Raghu Vatsavayi <rvatsavayi@...iumnetworks.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:57:01 -0700

> 2) As recommended by you removed custom module parameter max_vfs.

I feel the same way about num_queues_per_{p,v}f.

What's really strange is that there is a reference to num_queues_per_pf
in one of the kernel log messages already.