lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:16:23 +0100
From:   Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>
To:     David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...com, daniel@...earbox.net,
        maheshb@...gle.com, tgraf@...g.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/5] bpf: Refactor cgroups code in prep for
 new type

On 10/31/2016 06:05 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 10/31/16 11:00 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> On 10/31/2016 05:58 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com> Date: Wed, 26 Oct
>>> 2016 17:58:38 -0700
>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>>>> b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index 6b62ee9a2f78..73da296c2125
>>>> 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++
>>>> b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ enum bpf_prog_type
>>>> { BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, 
>>>> BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT, -	BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, +
>>>> BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP, };
>>>> 
>>>> enum bpf_attach_type {
>>> 
>>> If we do this then the cgroup-bpf series should use this value
>>> rather than changing it after-the-fact in your series here.
>>> 
>> 
>> Yeah, I'm confused too. I changed that name in my v7 from 
>> BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK to BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB on David's
>> (Ahern) request. Why is it now renamed again?
> 
> Thomas pushed back on adding another program type in favor of using
> subtypes. So this makes the program type generic to CGROUP and patch
> 2 in this v2 set added Mickaƫl's subtype patch with the socket
> mangling done that way in patch 3.
> 

Fine for me. I can change it around again.


Thanks,
Daniel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists