[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1477946602-19644-11-git-send-email-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 20:43:18 +0000
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 10/14] nfp: create separate define for max number of vectors
We are currently using define for max TX rings to allocate IRQ
vectors. It's OK since the max number of rings for TX and RX
are currently the same, but lets make the code nicer by taking
max of the two.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net.h | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net.h
index 9ca066b29f07..55a497c02237 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net.h
@@ -87,6 +87,9 @@
/* Queue/Ring definitions */
#define NFP_NET_MAX_TX_RINGS 64 /* Max. # of Tx rings per device */
#define NFP_NET_MAX_RX_RINGS 64 /* Max. # of Rx rings per device */
+#define NFP_NET_MAX_R_VECS (NFP_NET_MAX_TX_RINGS > NFP_NET_MAX_RX_RINGS ? \
+ NFP_NET_MAX_TX_RINGS : NFP_NET_MAX_RX_RINGS)
+#define NFP_NET_MAX_IRQS (NFP_NET_NON_Q_VECTORS + NFP_NET_MAX_R_VECS)
#define NFP_NET_MIN_TX_DESCS 256 /* Min. # of Tx descs per ring */
#define NFP_NET_MIN_RX_DESCS 256 /* Min. # of Rx descs per ring */
@@ -539,9 +542,8 @@ struct nfp_net {
u8 num_irqs;
u8 num_r_vecs;
- struct nfp_net_r_vector r_vecs[NFP_NET_MAX_TX_RINGS];
- struct msix_entry irq_entries[NFP_NET_NON_Q_VECTORS +
- NFP_NET_MAX_TX_RINGS];
+ struct nfp_net_r_vector r_vecs[NFP_NET_MAX_R_VECS];
+ struct msix_entry irq_entries[NFP_NET_MAX_IRQS];
irq_handler_t lsc_handler;
char lsc_name[IFNAMSIZ + 8];
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists