[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGhQ9Vw4XJnz1+8FMDDo90j2r_4U4xX30omQQU=bQmNb3sPA_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 18:19:42 +0100
From: Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com>,
"peppe.cavallaro" <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
alexandre.torgue@...com, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 3/7] stmmac: dwmac-sti: add PM ops and resume function
On 30 October 2016 at 21:05, Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com> wrote:
> Implement PM callbacks and driver remove in the driver instead
> of relying on the init/exit hooks in stmmac_platform. This gives
> the driver more flexibility in how the code is organized.
>
> Eventually the init/exit callbacks will be deprecated in favor
> of the standard PM callbacks and driver remove function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sti.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static int sti_dwmac_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct sti_dwmac *dwmac = get_stmmac_bsp_priv(dev);
> + int ret = stmmac_suspend(dev);
> +
> + clk_disable_unprepare(dwmac->clk);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int sti_dwmac_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct sti_dwmac *dwmac = get_stmmac_bsp_priv(dev);
> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> +
> + sti_dwmac_init(pdev, dwmac);
> +
> + return stmmac_resume(dev);
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
> +
> +SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(sti_dwmac_pm_ops, sti_dwmac_suspend, sti_dwmac_resume);
Just noticed that I am missing a 'static' here.
As this not critical for testing I'll resend the patch set after I
(hopefully) get some response from someone with the hw that can do a
test.
regards,
Joachim Eastwood
Powered by blists - more mailing lists