lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR0502MB29577BA8C670D1379CC4F1B7D4A10@VI1PR0502MB2957.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 Nov 2016 08:15:15 +0000
From:   Ilya Lesokhin <ilyal@...lanox.com>
To:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        tls-fpga-sw-dev <tls-fpga-sw-dev@...lanox.com>
Subject: Why does tcp collapse behavior depend on nr_frags?

Hi,
I've notice that tcp_can_collapse() returns false if skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags != 0.
Is there a reason why we want to base the collapse decision in retransmission on whether
the data is located in a frag or the linear part?

The relevant commit is
	 tcp: collapse more than two on retransmission  ('4a17fc3add594fcc1c778e93a95b6ecf47f630e5')

Thanks,
Ilya

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ