netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 08/11] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add port duplex setter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 1 Nov 2016 10:44:40 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 08/11] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add port duplex
 setter

>  	int (*port_set_link)(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port, int link);
> +
> +	/* Port's MAC duplex mode
> +	 *
> +	 * Use DUPLEX_HALF or DUPLEX_FULL to force half or full duplex, or
> +	 * DUPLEX_UNKNOWN for normal duplex detection.
> +	 */
> +	int (*port_set_duplex)(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port, int dup);

Hi Vivien

Again, i think DUPLEX_UNFORCED, or DUPLEX_AUTO would be better.

       Andrew