lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25b7fce6-49f9-bd54-5c12-c72298d107c1@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Nov 2016 15:24:32 +0200
From:   Gal Pressman <galp.dev@...il.com>
To:     Vidya Sagar Ravipati <vidya@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        davem@...emloft.net, linville@...driver.com, saeedm@...lanox.com,
        galp@...lanox.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, odedw@...lanox.com,
        ariela@...lanox.com, Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com, tzahio@...lanox.com
Cc:     roees@...lanox.com, aviadr@...lanox.com,
        dustin@...ulusnetworks.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] net: ethtool: add support for forward error
 correction modes



On 25/10/2016 05:50, Vidya Sagar Ravipati wrote:
> SET FEC option:
> root@tor: ethtool --set-fec  swp1 encoding [off | RS | BaseR | auto] autoneg [off | on]
> 
> Encoding: Types of encoding
> Off    :  Turning off any encoding
> RS     :  enforcing RS-FEC encoding on supported speeds
> BaseR  :  enforcing Base R encoding on supported speeds
> Auto   :  Default FEC settings  for  divers , and would represent

divers? :)

>           asking the hardware to essentially go into a best effort mode.
> 
> Here are a few examples of what we would expect if encoding=auto:
> - if autoneg is on, we are  expecting FEC to be negotiated as on or off
>   as long as protocol supports it
> - if the hardware is capable of detecting the FEC encoding on it's
>       receiver it will reconfigure its encoder to match
> - in absence of the above, the configuration would be set to IEEE
>   defaults.

Not sure I follow, why do we need an autoneg option if encoding type can be set to auto?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ