netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] net: ethernet: nb8800: handle all RGMII definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <58205103.4090208@laposte.net>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2016 11:01:39 +0100
From:   Sebastian Frias <sf84@...oste.net>
To:     Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] net: ethernet: nb8800: handle all RGMII
 definitions

Hi Måns,

On 11/05/2016 01:58 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>  	if (gigabit) {
>> -		if (priv->phy_mode == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII)
>> +		if (phy_interface_is_rgmii(phydev))
>>  			mac_mode |= RGMII_MODE;
>>
>>  		mac_mode |= GMAC_MODE;
> 
> As I said before, this part can/should be applied separately, although
> personally I probably wouldn't have bothered adding a single-use variable.

It was for consistency with other functions that use 'phydev', but I don't
mind making the changes.

Just to be clear, when you say "can/should be applied separately", do you
mean that this patch should not be part of a series, and that I should split
the series into separate patches?

Best regards,

Sebastian