[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161107095756.15343-1-bpoirier@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 17:57:56 +0800
From: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Rasesh Mody <rasesh.mody@...ium.com>,
Sudarsana Kalluru <sudarsana.kalluru@...ium.com>,
Dept-GELinuxNICDev@...ium.com
Subject: [PATCH] bna: Add synchronization for tx ring.
We received two reports of BUG_ON in bnad_txcmpl_process() where
hw_consumer_index appeared to be ahead of producer_index. Out of order
write/read of these variables could explain these reports.
bnad_start_xmit(), as a producer of tx descriptors, has a few memory
barriers sprinkled around writes to producer_index and the device's
doorbell but they're not paired with anything in bnad_txcmpl_process(), a
consumer.
Since we are synchronizing with a device, we must use mandatory barriers,
not smp_*. Also, I didn't see the purpose of the last smp_mb() in
bnad_start_xmit().
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/brocade/bna/bnad.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/brocade/bna/bnad.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/brocade/bna/bnad.c
index f9df4b5a..f42f672 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/brocade/bna/bnad.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/brocade/bna/bnad.c
@@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ bnad_txcmpl_process(struct bnad *bnad, struct bna_tcb *tcb)
return 0;
hw_cons = *(tcb->hw_consumer_index);
+ rmb();
cons = tcb->consumer_index;
q_depth = tcb->q_depth;
@@ -3094,7 +3095,7 @@ bnad_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev)
BNA_QE_INDX_INC(prod, q_depth);
tcb->producer_index = prod;
- smp_mb();
+ wmb();
if (unlikely(!test_bit(BNAD_TXQ_TX_STARTED, &tcb->flags)))
return NETDEV_TX_OK;
@@ -3102,7 +3103,6 @@ bnad_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev)
skb_tx_timestamp(skb);
bna_txq_prod_indx_doorbell(tcb);
- smp_mb();
return NETDEV_TX_OK;
}
--
2.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists