[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1478642646.7545.39.camel@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 22:04:23 +0000
From: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>
CC: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Manfred.Rudigier@...cron.at" <Manfred.Rudigier@...cron.at>,
"ulrik.debie-os@...ig.org" <ulrik.debie-os@...ig.org>,
"stefan.sorensen@...ctralink.com" <stefan.sorensen@...ctralink.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"john.stultz@...aro.org" <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] ptp: igb: Use the high resolution
frequency method.
On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 22:49 +0100, Richard Cochran wrote:
> The 82580 and related devices offer a frequency resolution of about
> 0.029 ppb. This patch lets users of the device benefit from the
> increased frequency resolution when tuning the clock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
> ---
Additionally, what about min/max frequency check? Wouldn't this need to
be updated for the new adjfine operation?
Thanks,
Jake
Powered by blists - more mailing lists