lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161108130623.4b9b4403@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2016 13:06:23 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the rdma-leon-test tree with the
 net-next tree

Hi Leon,

Today's linux-next merge of the rdma-leon-test tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c

between commit:

  453d39329ad0 ("IB/core: Flip to the new dev walk API")

from the net-next tree and commit:

  e4b4d6b5d8c2 ("IB/core: Remove debug prints after allocation failure")

from the rdma-leon-test tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c
index 3a64a0881882,c86ddcea7675..000000000000
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c
@@@ -437,28 -434,6 +434,26 @@@ static void callback_for_addr_gid_devic
  			  &parsed->gid_attr);
  }
  
 +struct upper_list {
 +	struct list_head list;
 +	struct net_device *upper;
 +};
 +
 +static int netdev_upper_walk(struct net_device *upper, void *data)
 +{
 +	struct upper_list *entry = kmalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_ATOMIC);
 +	struct list_head *upper_list = data;
 +
- 	if (!entry) {
- 		pr_info("roce_gid_mgmt: couldn't allocate entry to delete ndev\n");
++	if (!entry)
 +		return 0;
- 	}
 +
 +	list_add_tail(&entry->list, upper_list);
 +	dev_hold(upper);
 +	entry->upper = upper;
 +
 +	return 0;
 +}
 +
  static void handle_netdev_upper(struct ib_device *ib_dev, u8 port,
  				void *cookie,
  				void (*handle_netdev)(struct ib_device *ib_dev,

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ