[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58235E0A.2030305@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 11:34:02 -0600
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] net: phy: phy drivers should not set
SUPPORTED_Pause or SUPPORTED_Asym_Pause
On 11/09/2016 11:06 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> 1) PHY drivers and/or phylib sets the SUPPORTED_Pause |
>> SUPPORTED_AsymPause bits in phydev->supported. This indicates that the
>> PHY supports pause frames.
>
> Agreed.
So I'm still not sure *where* phylib should set the bits in
phydev->supported. I previously thought that phy_sanitize_settings()
would be a candidate, but that function is called only when
autonegotiation is disabled.
So the only thing I can think of is to do this:
/* A mapping of all SUPPORTED settings to speed/duplex */
static const struct phy_setting settings[] = {
{
.speed = SPEED_10000,
.duplex = DUPLEX_FULL,
- .setting = SUPPORTED_10000baseKR_Full,
+ .setting = SUPPORTED_10000baseKR_Full |
+ SUPPORTED_Pause | SUPPORTED_Asym_Pause,
... for all of the entries in settings[]
But this seems excessive, and I don't know if all of these SPEED_xxx
standards actually support pause frames.
>> >3) When the link state changes, the MAC driver checks
>> >phydev->advertising, and if the bits are set, then it enables those
>> >features in the MAC.
> Almost, we need to see what the link partner advertised, by looking at
> phydev->pause / phydev->asym_pause and checking the local knobs whether
> flow control can be enabled, but other than that, this looks correct to me.
Yes, that's what I meant to write. Fortunately, my EMAC driver already
does this.
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists