netdev - [PATCH net 0/2] qed: Fix RoCE infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1478724524-16940-1-git-send-email-Yuval.Mintz@cavium.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Nov 2016 22:48:42 +0200
From:   Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com>
To:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, <dledford@...hat.com>,
        <Ram.Amrani@...ium.com>, Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 0/2] qed: Fix RoCE infrastructure

This series fixes 2 basic issues with RoCE support,
one handles a missing configuration in the initial infrastructure
support while the other is a regression introduced by one of the
initial fix submissions.

Dave,

I've built this series against 'net'  [specifically on top of
cdb26d3387f0 ("net: bgmac: fix reversed checks for clock control flag")],
but I'm not entirely convinced whether that's the right place for them -
On one-hand, they're RoCE-specific fixes, but they're also infrastructure
fixes that are wholly contained inside qed.
Would like to hear your [and Doug's] preference on whether we should
target such patches to net or linux-rdma.

Thanks,
Yuval

Ram Amrani (2):
  qed: configure ll2 RoCE v1/v2 flavor correctly
  qed: correct rdma params configuration

 drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_hsi.h  |  3 ---
 drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_ll2.c  |  1 +
 drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_main.c | 17 ++++++++---------
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.3