[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161109131511.GB6491@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 14:15:11 +0100
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Manfred.Rudigier@...cron.at" <Manfred.Rudigier@...cron.at>,
"ulrik.debie-os@...ig.org" <ulrik.debie-os@...ig.org>,
"stefan.sorensen@...ctralink.com" <stefan.sorensen@...ctralink.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"john.stultz@...aro.org" <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] ptp: igb: Use the high resolution frequency
method.
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 10:04:23PM +0000, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> Additionally, what about min/max frequency check? Wouldn't this need to
> be updated for the new adjfine operation?
In theory you might increase the max by some sub-ppb value, but we
cannot express that as the resolution of the user space interface is
in ppb, and that little extra is not important anyhow.
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists