netdev - Re: [PATCH] wireless: fix bogus maybe-uninitialized warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2654653.cBclyC49py@wuerfel>
Date:   Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:06:32 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Stanislav Yakovlev <stas.yakovlev@...il.com>,
        Jouni Malinen <j@...fi>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless: fix bogus maybe-uninitialized warning

On Wednesday, November 9, 2016 9:10:46 AM CET Johannes Berg wrote:
> 
> > Ideally we prefer that drivers/net/wireless and net/wireless changes
> > are
> > split into different patches as they get applied to different trees.

Ok, good to know. I had split out the drivers/staging changes, but
wasn't sure about the granularity you'd want here.

> > Johannes, is it ok if I take this change through my tree this time?

> Sure, please do, thanks.
> 
> (I don't particularly care about the lib80211 stuff anyway)

Thanks!

	Arnd