lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1478794575-28748-1-git-send-email-ssurya@ieee.org>
Date:   Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:16:15 -0500
From:   Stephen Suryaputra Lin <stephen.suryaputra.lin@...il.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Stephen Suryaputra Lin <ssurya@...e.org>
Subject: [PATCH net,v2] ipv4: use new_gw for redirect neigh lookup

In v2.6, ip_rt_redirect() calls arp_bind_neighbour() which returns 0
and then the state of the neigh for the new_gw is checked. If the state
isn't valid then the redirected route is deleted. This behavior is
maintained up to v3.5.7 by check_peer_redirect() because rt->rt_gateway
is assigned to peer->redirect_learned.a4 before calling
ipv4_neigh_lookup().

After commit 5943634fc559 ("ipv4: Maintain redirect and PMTU info in
struct rtable again."), ipv4_neigh_lookup() is performed without the
rt_gateway assigned to the new_gw. In the case when rt_gateway (old_gw)
isn't zero, the function uses it as the key. The neigh is most likely
valid since the old_gw is the one that sends the ICMP redirect message.
Then the new_gw is assigned to fib_nh_exception. The problem is: the
new_gw ARP may never gets resolved and the traffic is blackholed.

So, use the new_gw for neigh lookup.

Changes from v1:
 - use __ipv4_neigh_lookup instead (per Eric Dumazet).

Fixes: 5943634fc559 ("ipv4: Maintain redirect and PMTU info in struct rtable again.")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Suryaputra Lin <ssurya@...e.org>
---
 net/ipv4/route.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index 62d4d90c1389..2a57566e6e91 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -753,7 +753,9 @@ static void __ip_do_redirect(struct rtable *rt, struct sk_buff *skb, struct flow
 			goto reject_redirect;
 	}
 
-	n = ipv4_neigh_lookup(&rt->dst, NULL, &new_gw);
+	n = __ipv4_neigh_lookup(rt->dst.dev, new_gw);
+	if (!n)
+		n = neigh_create(&arp_tbl, &new_gw, rt->dst.dev);
 	if (!IS_ERR(n)) {
 		if (!(n->nud_state & NUD_VALID)) {
 			neigh_event_send(n, NULL);
-- 
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ