[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpW=q4nm97dNouSL19Cr2cEWT9xQHXAm4CNJk=AY8z_2MA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 09:11:29 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
pravin shelar <pshelar@....org>,
Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho.andersen@...onical.com>,
Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genetlink: fix unsigned int comparison with less than zero
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> family->id is unsigned, so the less than zero check for
> failure return from idr_alloc is never true and so the error exit
> is never handled. Instead, assign err and check if this is less
> than zero since this is a signed integer.
Why family->id can't be just signed int? For me it should be.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists