[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd19302c-8ae9-efd6-dbb6-66c7bc1b2a82@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 19:52:22 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ipv4: ip_send_unicast_reply should set oif only if
it is L3 master
On 11/9/16 7:48 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 14:50:31 -0800
>
>> Lorenzo noted an Android unit test failed due to commit e0d56fdd7342:
>> "The expectation in the test was that the RST replying to a SYN sent to a
>> closed port should be generated with oif=0. In other words it should not
>> prefer the interface where the SYN came in on, but instead should follow
>> whatever the routing table says it should do."
>>
>> Since this a change in behavior, revert the change to
>> ip_send_unicast_reply such that the oif in the flow is set to the skb_iif
>> only if skb_iif is an L3 master.
>>
>> Fixes: e0d56fdd7342 ("net: l3mdev: remove redundant calls")
>> Reported-by: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>
> David, I'm assuming that a new spin of this patch is coming.
>
yes. posted this morning; Lorenzo tested and ack'ed an hour or so ago. Since it expanded to include IPv6, the subject line changed so it won't be readily apparent.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists