[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOrHB_BTV8cAgDLnK89eyZbQnkfbBLmj_zWRom2xrUPayLDBGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 19:34:12 -0800
From: Pravin Shelar <pshelar@....org>
To: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/7] vxlan: simplify RTF_LOCAL handling.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 11:45:55 -0700, Pravin B Shelar wrote:
>> +static int check_route_rtf_local(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
>> + struct vxlan_dev *vxlan, union vxlan_addr *daddr,
>> + __be32 dst_port, __be32 vni, struct dst_entry *dst,
>> + u32 rt_flags)
>
> It's not just checking, it's also bypassing encapsulation if the check
> is successful. Would be good to use a name that suggests this effect,
> e.g. encap_bypass_if_local (I know, not a nice name) or something.
>
I am fine with this name. I will change the patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists