netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/9] net: add support for IPv6 Segment Routing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <58243939.5000200@uclouvain.be>
Date:   Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:09:13 +0100
From:   David Lebrun <david.lebrun@...ouvain.be>
To:     Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/9] net: add support for IPv6 Segment Routing

On 11/10/2016 09:35 AM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> Not sure how to fix this. The following makes IPv6 work again, but I
> suspect it mostly defeats the purpose of having SRH on by default:
> 
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LWTUNNEL
>          err = seg6_iptunnel_init();
>          if (err)
>                  goto out_unregister_pernet;
> +#endif
> 
> Enabling CONFIG_LWTUNNEL also makes IPv6 work again.
> 
> The breakage was caught by the kernel test robot, but the message was
> not particularly scary:

Oops. The easiest fix I can think of is adding an option to
enable/disable seg6's LWT which would select CONFIG_LWTUNNEL. That would
still let the core SR processing be enabled by default.

Comments ?

David


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (164 bytes)