[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161110114411.GA4155@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 12:44:11 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Levy, Amir (Jer)" <amir.jer.levy@...el.com>
Cc: "andreas.noever@...il.com" <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"mario_limonciello@...l.com" <mario_limonciello@...l.com>,
thunderbolt-linux <thunderbolt-linux@...el.com>,
"Westerberg, Mika" <mika.westerberg@...el.com>,
"Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
"Zhang, Xiong Y" <xiong.y.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] thunderbolt: Introducing Thunderbolt(TM)
Networking
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:39:19AM +0000, Levy, Amir (Jer) wrote:
> > And how about getting some internal-Intel kernel developers to review and
> > sign-off on this code? Don't make the community do the review when you
> > have access to resources like this. You have an internal mailing list for this
> > very purpose, use it!
> >
>
> The review with the internal-Intel kernel developers was done before submitting
> the first patch set.
Then why is their signed-off-by:s not on the patchset showing that they
"bless" this series?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists