[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <E607265CB020454880711A6F96C05A03B677F535@hasmsx107.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:48:45 +0000
From: "Levy, Amir (Jer)" <amir.jer.levy@...el.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "andreas.noever@...il.com" <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"mario_limonciello@...l.com" <mario_limonciello@...l.com>,
thunderbolt-linux <thunderbolt-linux@...el.com>,
"Westerberg, Mika" <mika.westerberg@...el.com>,
"Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
"Zhang, Xiong Y" <xiong.y.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 0/8] thunderbolt: Introducing Thunderbolt(TM)
Networking
On Thu, Nov 10 2016, 01:44 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:39:19AM +0000, Levy, Amir (Jer) wrote:
> > > And how about getting some internal-Intel kernel developers to
> > > review and sign-off on this code? Don't make the community do the
> > > review when you have access to resources like this. You have an
> > > internal mailing list for this very purpose, use it!
> > >
> >
> > The review with the internal-Intel kernel developers was done before
> > submitting the first patch set.
>
> Then why is their signed-off-by:s not on the patchset showing that they
> "bless" this series?
>
Working on it.
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists