lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161114191446.GH1352@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
Date:   Mon, 14 Nov 2016 19:14:46 +0000
From:   Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
To:     "Jorgen S. Hansen" <jhansen@...are.com>
Cc:     "cavery@...hat.com" <cavery@...hat.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: AF_VSOCK loopback

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 02:14:44PM +0000, Jorgen S. Hansen wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> All datagram communication in VMCI based AF_VSOCK is going through the host - also for loopback communication. The only difference wrt loopback is that the VMCI queue pairs implementing the shared queues for the stream protocols aren't registered with the hypervisor - they are created specifying the VMCI_QPFLAG_LOCAL flag, and exist only as local guest memory.
> 
> So in the current form, there isn't much loopback code in the vmci AF_VSOCK implementation, so it doesn't seem like there would be much to share either.

Thanks for clarifying.  I'm playing with a virtio-vsock implementation
of loopback and expect send patches later this week.

Stefan

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (456 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ