[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161114191446.GH1352@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 19:14:46 +0000
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
To: "Jorgen S. Hansen" <jhansen@...are.com>
Cc: "cavery@...hat.com" <cavery@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: AF_VSOCK loopback
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 02:14:44PM +0000, Jorgen S. Hansen wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> All datagram communication in VMCI based AF_VSOCK is going through the host - also for loopback communication. The only difference wrt loopback is that the VMCI queue pairs implementing the shared queues for the stream protocols aren't registered with the hypervisor - they are created specifying the VMCI_QPFLAG_LOCAL flag, and exist only as local guest memory.
>
> So in the current form, there isn't much loopback code in the vmci AF_VSOCK implementation, so it doesn't seem like there would be much to share either.
Thanks for clarifying. I'm playing with a virtio-vsock implementation
of loopback and expect send patches later this week.
Stefan
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (456 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists