lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:54:16 +0800
From:   Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>
To:     Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Jojy Varghese <jojvargh@...co.com>,
        Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
        Yibin Yang <yibyang@...co.com>, lkp@...org,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [net] 2ab9fb18c4: kernel BUG at
 include/linux/skbuff.h:1935!

On 11/14, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>>>Hi guys.
>>>
>>>I took a look at the commit again and I do not see how this can happen.
>>>
>>>Are you sure patch was properly applied ?
>>>
>>>In particular, the following extract is obscure for me :
>>>
>>>
>>>>https://github.com/0day-ci/linux Eric-Dumazet/net-__skb_flow_dissect-must-cap-its-return-value/20161110-080839
>>>>commit 2ab9fb18c46b91b16a0f0f329336d3be9fc32deb ("net: __skb_flow_dissect() must cap its return value")
>>>>
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>The above two lines means 0day repo setup a new branch
>>"Eric-Dumazet/net-__skb_flow_dissect-must-cap-its-return-value/20161110-080839"
>>which is based on net/master, then applied you patch on top of it,
>>commit id is 2ab9fb18c46b91b16a0f0f329336d3be9fc32deb.
>
>Xiaolong, it may be more helpful to show the base tree where we apply
>the patch to. And the final url:
>
>https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/tree/Eric-Dumazet/net-__skb_flow_dissect-must-cap-its-return-value/20161110-080839
>

Ok, I'll improve the appearance to make it more clear.

Thanks,
Xiaolong
>Thanks,
>Fengguang

Powered by blists - more mailing lists