lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:54:16 +0800
From:   Ye Xiaolong <>
To:     Fengguang Wu <>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <>,
        Alexander Duyck <>,
        Willem de Bruijn <>,
        netdev <>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <>,
        Jojy Varghese <>,
        Tom Herbert <>,
        Yibin Yang <>,,
        David Miller <>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [net] 2ab9fb18c4: kernel BUG at

On 11/14, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>>>Hi guys.
>>>I took a look at the commit again and I do not see how this can happen.
>>>Are you sure patch was properly applied ?
>>>In particular, the following extract is obscure for me :
>>>> Eric-Dumazet/net-__skb_flow_dissect-must-cap-its-return-value/20161110-080839
>>>>commit 2ab9fb18c46b91b16a0f0f329336d3be9fc32deb ("net: __skb_flow_dissect() must cap its return value")
>>The above two lines means 0day repo setup a new branch
>>which is based on net/master, then applied you patch on top of it,
>>commit id is 2ab9fb18c46b91b16a0f0f329336d3be9fc32deb.
>Xiaolong, it may be more helpful to show the base tree where we apply
>the patch to. And the final url:

Ok, I'll improve the appearance to make it more clear.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists