lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8010f40d-e7ca-8fd1-7317-f576289c112f@molgen.mpg.de>
Date:   Mon, 14 Nov 2016 09:25:47 +0100
From:   Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To:     Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        michael.chan@...adcom.com, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dept-GELinuxNICDev@...ium.com,
        rasesh.mody@...ium.com, harish.patil@...ium.com,
        frank@...ermydesk.org, jsr@....edzone.net, jroedel@...e.de,
        dyoung@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] bnx2: Wait for in-flight DMA to complete at probe
 stage

Dear Baoquan,

On 11/13/16 06:01, Baoquan He wrote:
> This is v2 post.
>
> In commit 3e1be7a ("bnx2: Reset device during driver initialization"),
> firmware requesting code was moved from open stage to probe stage.
> The reason is in kdump kernel hardware iommu need device be reset in
> driver probe stage, otherwise those in-flight DMA from 1st kernel
> will continue going and look up into the newly created io-page tables.
> However bnx2 chip resetting involves firmware requesting issue, that
> need be done in open stage.
>
> Michale Chan suggested we can just wait for the old in-flight DMA to
> complete at probe stage, then though without device resetting, we
> don't need to worry the old in-flight DMA could continue looking up
> the newly created io-page tables.
>
> v1->v2:
>     Michael suggested to wait for the in-flight DMA to complete at probe
>     stage. So give up the old method of trying to reset chip at probe
>     stage, take the new way accordingly.

thank you for posting the updated series. Could you please resend a v3 
with stable@...r.kernel.org added [1]?


Kind regards,

Paul


[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ