netdev - Re: Debugging Ethernet issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5829BBFC.7040800@free.fr>
Date:   Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:28:28 +0100
From:   Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>,
        Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Zach Brown <zach.brown@...com>,
        Shaohui Xie <shaohui.xie@....com>,
        Tim Beale <tim.beale@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
        Brian Hill <brian@...ston-radar.com>,
        Vince Bridgers <vbridgers2013@...il.com>,
        Balakumaran Kannan <kumaran.4353@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sebastian Frias <sf84@...oste.net>,
        Kirill Kapranov <kapranoff@...ox.ru>
Subject: Re: Debugging Ethernet issues

On 13/11/2016 20:55, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Le 13/11/2016 à 11:51, Mason a écrit :
>> On 13/11/2016 04:09, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>
>>> Mason wrote:
>>>
>>>> When connected to a Gigabit switch
>>>> 3.4 negotiates a LAN DHCP setup instantly
>>>> 4.7 requires over 5 seconds to do so
>>>
>>> When you run tcpdump on the DHCP server, are you noticing the first
>>> request is missing?
>>>
>>> What can happen is the dhclient gets started immediately and sends out
>>> its first request before auto-negotiation has finished. So this first packet
>>> gets lost. The retransmit after a few seconds is then successful.
>>
>> I will run tcpdump on the server as I run udhcpc on the client
>> for Linux 3.4 vs 4.7
>>
>> Do you know what would make auto-negotiation fail at 100 Mbps
>> on 4.7? (whereas it succeeds on 3.4)
>>
>> (Thinking out loud) If the problem were in auto-negotiation,
>> then if should work if I hard-code speed and duplex using
>> ethtool, right? (IIRC, hard-coding doesn't help.)
> 
> I would start with checking basic things:
> 
> - does your Ethernet driver get a link UP being reported correctly
> (netif_carrier_ok returns 1)?

I don't see any calls to netif_carrier_ok() in the network driver
( drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c )
Maybe it is using some generic infrastructure?

> - if you let the bootloader configure the PHY and utilize the Generic
> PHY driver instead of the Atheros PHY driver, does the problem appear as
> well?

How exactly does one use the generic PHY driver?
Do you mean the following?
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fixed-link.txt

Regards.