[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161115230317.GG23231@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:03:17 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
charrer@...critech.com, liodot@...il.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next 1/2] net: ethernet: slicoss: add slicoss gigabit
ethernet driver
> >>>>> + val = MII_BMCR << 16 | SLIC_PCR_AUTONEG |
> >>>>> + SLIC_PCR_AUTONEG_RST;
> >>>>> + slic_write(sdev, SLIC_REG_WPHY, val);
> Thats essentially what I meant by setting a flag in the irq handler. The mdio
> function would have to check somehow if the irq has been fired (be it by means
> of a flag or a completion that is set by the irq handler and checked by the
> mdio function). So I agree that it should work (if reading via the AP command
> is actually possible).
It seems odd you have a nice simple way to do writes, but reads are
very complex. There might be a simple read method hiding somewhere.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists