netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] ipv6: sr: fix IPv6 initialization failure without lwtunnels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:17:20 +0100
From:   David Lebrun <david.lebrun@...ouvain.be>
To:     Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
CC:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <lorenzo@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] ipv6: sr: fix IPv6 initialization failure
 without lwtunnels

On 11/14/2016 03:22 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> I prefer option b). most LWTUNNEL encaps are done this way.
> 
> seg6 and seg6_iptunnel is new segment routing code and can be under
> CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6 which depends on CONFIG_LWTUNNEL and CONFIG_IPV6.
> CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_HMAC could then depend on CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6

Will do that, thanks

David


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (164 bytes)