[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161116143836.2448688-1-arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:38:21 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] bpf: fix possible uninitialized access in inactive rotation
This newly added code causes a build warning:
kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c: In function '__bpf_lru_list_rotate_inactive':
kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:201:28: error: 'next' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
The warning is plausible from looking at the code, though there might
be non-obvious external constraints that ensure it always works.
Moving the assignment of ->next_inactive_rotation inside of the
loop makes it obvious to the reader and the compiler when we
actually want to update ->next.
Fixes: 3a08c2fd7634 ("bpf: LRU List")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c
index bfebff010ba9..f462e5f09703 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c
@@ -192,13 +192,14 @@ static void __bpf_lru_list_rotate_inactive(struct bpf_lru *lru,
next = cur->prev;
if (bpf_lru_node_is_ref(node))
__bpf_lru_node_move(l, node, BPF_LRU_LIST_T_ACTIVE);
- if (cur == last)
+ if (cur == last) {
+ l->next_inactive_rotation = next;
break;
+ }
cur = next;
i++;
}
- l->next_inactive_rotation = next;
}
/* Shrink the inactive list. It starts from the tail of the
--
2.9.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists