[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1479277452.8455.156.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 22:24:12 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] virtio-net: add a missing synchronize_net()
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
It seems many drivers do not respect napi_hash_del() contract.
When napi_hash_del() is used before netif_napi_del(), an RCU grace
period is needed before freeing NAPI object.
Fixes: 91815639d880 ("virtio-net: rx busy polling support")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
---
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index fd8b1e62301f..7276d5a95bd0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -1497,6 +1497,11 @@ static void virtnet_free_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi)
netif_napi_del(&vi->rq[i].napi);
}
+ /* We called napi_hash_del() before netif_napi_del(),
+ * we need to respect an RCU grace period before freeing vi->rq
+ */
+ synchronize_net();
+
kfree(vi->rq);
kfree(vi->sq);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists