[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161117142227.7753ef12@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:22:27 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
net/core/dev.c: In function 'sk_busy_loop':
net/core/dev.c:5065:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_relax_lowlatency' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
cpu_relax_lowlatency();
^
Caused by commit
5bd0b85ba8bb ("locking/core, arch: Remove cpu_relax_lowlatency()")
interacting with commit
217f69743681 ("net: busy-poll: allow preemption in sk_busy_loop()")
from the net-next tree.
I have applied the following merge fix patch.
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:13:05 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] net: busy-poll: fix up for cpu_relax_lowlatency() removal
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
---
net/core/dev.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index d29d538ec5ad..6b9f8eb55b62 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5062,7 +5062,7 @@ bool sk_busy_loop(struct sock *sk, int nonblock)
return rc;
goto restart;
}
- cpu_relax_lowlatency();
+ cpu_relax();
}
if (napi_poll)
busy_poll_stop(napi, have_poll_lock);
--
2.10.2
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists