[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1479511316.8455.303.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 15:21:56 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: tgraf@...g.ch, shm@...ulusnetworks.com,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
davem@...emloft.net, john.r.fastabend@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bblanco@...mgrid.com, brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] virtio_net: Add XDP support
On Fri, 2016-11-18 at 11:00 -0800, John Fastabend wrote:
> static void free_receive_bufs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> {
> + struct bpf_prog *old_prog;
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> while (vi->rq[i].pages)
> __free_pages(get_a_page(&vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL), 0);
> +
> + old_prog = rcu_dereference(vi->rq[i].xdp_prog);
Seems wrong to me.
Are you sure lockdep (with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y) was happy with this ?
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(vi->rq[i].xdp_prog, NULL);
> + if (old_prog)
> + bpf_prog_put(old_prog);
> }
> }
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists